Preliminary Accessibility Assessment
https://zinger.io
Standard: WCAG 2.1 A/AA · Assessed: July 15, 2026 · Scope: homepage (preliminary software sweep)
32 / 100 · Grade F
This preliminary score reflects 3 verified failure types affecting 12 elements on the page assessed. A preliminary sweep is a floor, not a ceiling: manual testing with screen readers and keyboard-only navigation typically surfaces additional barriers that software cannot detect. 19 checks passed.
Findings, ordered by severity
| Severity | Finding & remediation | Elements | Example locations |
|---|---|---|---|
| critical |
Images on the page have no text alternative. A screen-reader user hears "image" — or nothing — instead of what the picture shows or does.
How to fix: Add an alt attribute to every <img>. Describe the function of the image (e.g. alt="Add to cart"), or use alt="" for purely decorative images so screen readers skip them. WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A) ·
rule |
1 | img[height="75"] |
| serious |
Text does not stand out enough from its background. Customers with low vision — and anyone reading on a phone in sunlight — may not be able to read it.
How to fix: Adjust text or background colors until the contrast ratio is at least 4.5:1 for body text (3:1 for large headings). Your designer can verify pairs with any contrast checker before shipping. WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (Level AA) ·
rule |
8 | #navigation > li:nth-child(1) > a[href="index.html"]#navigation > li:nth-child(2) > a[href$="about.html"]#navigation > li:nth-child(3) > a[href$="contact.html"] |
| serious |
Links on the page have no accessible name. A screen-reader user hears "link" with no idea where it goes — these are often icon-only links.
How to fix: Give every link discernible text: visible text inside the <a>, or an aria-label (e.g. aria-label="Plainsight on LinkedIn") for icon links. WCAG 2.4.4 Link Purpose / 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (Level A) ·
rule |
3 | .logo > a[href="index.html"].footer-logo > a[href="index.html"].footer-social > a[href="#"] |
What this means
Each finding above maps to a specific WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion — the standard referenced in most ADA web-accessibility settlements and court decisions. Critical and serious findings are the ones most commonly cited in demand letters, because they block real tasks for real users.
The recommended next step for a score in this range is a full manual audit of the site’s critical user flows, followed by remediation in severity order and a confirming re-test.
Engagement options Ask a question about this report
Prepared by Plainsight Compliance, Kansas City, Missouri. This report is a technical assessment of conformance with accessibility standards. It is not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by its delivery. Distribution of this sample report has been authorized by the site owner.